- SG: +65 64383504
- IN: 022 25771219
- IN: 022 25792714
- IN: +91 9987536436
The 2038 problem and how to solve it for MongoDB
Rajiv Thapar | APAC Partner Director, MongoDB
This year, 2019, is halfway between 2000 and 2038. If you don’t know, 2038 is going to be an interesting year like 2000 was an interesting year for dates and times. 2038 is the year that the 32-bit signed integers that people have been using since the 1970s to represent time will roll over; 2,147,483,647 seconds will have passed since 1 January 1970 and rolling over means the signed value flip to the largest negative value.
As negative values are used to represent the years before 1970, some systems will suddenly time travel into 1901. Others will trip up with date calculations or logic and make new errors. It all makes for a lot of software breaking in 2038. But you don’t have to wait till 2038 to enjoy these problems. If your applications deal with dates in the future, especially up to 20 years in the future, and you use a 32-bit time field then some of your calculations may already be overflowing.
Do I Have A Problem?
First the good news. You should already be using 64-bit dates in MongoDB unless a design decision was taken to use old Unix style 32-bit dates. Why would someone have done that though? Let’s have a look:
- A time series database includes a lot of timestamps so the opportunity to save 4 bytes per timestamp is quite tempting when you are dealing with hundreds of millions of timestamps.
- An application interacting with a legacy app may store 32-bit dates given to it by the legacy app. The legacy app will likely need updating, but that’s no reason to leave the database with data that could cause problems in 2038.
That’s the date “now” in 32-bit Unix time. Now if I start up
That is not “now”. The Date class can take a value in a constructor, but it has to be a time in milliseconds. So, let’s multiply that by 1000 before handing it to Date.
Now we have it, if we want to get the 32 bit Unix date time, we can get the value and divide by 1000.
Word of warning though, don’t make assumptions this will work. After 2038, that calculation will return an invalid value. Make sure you do some validation before you try and covert back.
Now in MongoDB, as I said, we use Date as the foundation for date handling, but we wrap it in ISODate for portability. Let’s just wake up the mongo shell and try the above with MongoDB:
That error is because ISODate’s are meant to be created with formatted strings of date and time, not with integer or long values. But it’s not a problem because in the shell, if you create a Date…
… you get an ISODate back anyway. ISODate has all the Date methods too, so valueOf() works.
As a bonus, when you save an ISODate, it is typed so browsing the data will show you human-readable:
That’s so much easier to parse than an apparently arbitrary integer which is how 32-bit dates are typically stored.
Actions for Tomorrow
Now you know this, you may want to consider regularly reviewing your own code to make sure that you aren’t importing 32-bit dates and keeping them as 32-bit integer dates. It’s simple to convert them to 64-bit values as we’ve shown. The 4 extra bytes per date versus a massive migration headache should be an easy decision to make. Also, look out for those 32-bit integer dates leaving your application and heading to other components; you can convert the dates back down to 32-bits but make a note where those down conversions are happening.
Underlying this all is a simple message, future proof now and make all dates 64-bit ISODates(). You’ll not only win peace of mind but easier to read dates in your database.
- Rajiv Thapar has over two decades of experience in IT Business Value Chain with exposure to General Management with P&L responsibility, Direct and Channel sales in Commercial and Consumer space, Product Management and Project Management.
- MongoDB Named A Leader in The Forrester Wave™: Database-As-A-Service Q2 2019
- Are you the next MongoDB Certified Professional of the Year?
- The 2038 problem and how to solve it for MongoDB