

Table of Contents
Can your PostgreSQL survive a node failure—without waking your team at 3 AM?
That’s the real test of High Availability (HA). When a PostgreSQL instance fails—and it will—your recovery strategy determines whether users feel a blip or your business feels a burn.
Over the past decade, I’ve helped platform teams across finance, logistics, and the public sector modernize their database architectures—from legacy failover scripts to automated HA clusters. One question keeps recurring:
“Should we use Patroni or repmgr—or is native streaming replication good enough?”
In this blog, I’ll break down exactly how these three PostgreSQL HA options compare, where they shine, and where they fall short—so you can architect with confidence.
Why High Availability Needs More Than Replication
PostgreSQL’s native streaming replication is battle-tested. But replication ≠ failover.
Let’s clear that up:
- Native streaming replication keeps standbys in sync with the primary.
- But it doesn’t handle failover orchestration.
- And it certainly won’t update your DNS, reconfigure connection pools, or handle fencing.
For that, you need something smarter. That’s where Patroni and repmgr come in.
Comparing the Three: Patroni vs repmgr vs Native Streaming
Let’s break it down across 5 key dimensions:
- Failover Automation
- Native Streaming: No built-in failover. Manual intervention required. Your ops team becomes your HA mechanism.
- repmgr: Provides basic failover via repmgrd. Needs scripting for full orchestration.
- Patroni: Built for automated failover using distributed consensus stores like etcd, Consul, or ZooKeeper.
- Cluster State Management
- Native Streaming: Minimal cluster state awareness.
- repmgr: Basic topology visibility via CLI.
- Patroni: Full state orchestration via Distributed Configuration Store (DCS).
- Installation and Operational Overhead
- Native Streaming: Simple, integrated PostgreSQL feature.
- repmgr: Easy setup, minimal overhead.
- Patroni: Higher setup complexity but optimal for mission-critical workloads.
- Connection Management
- Native Streaming: Requires manual client routing (PgBouncer, HAProxy).
- repmgr: Limited built-in client management.
- Patroni: Seamless integration with HAProxy for automated traffic redirection.
- Cloud & Kubernetes Readiness
- Native Streaming: Not cloud-native.
- repmgr: Limited Kubernetes/cloud support.
- Patroni: Fully Kubernetes-compatible, designed for cloud-native setups.
So, Which One Should You Choose?
Here’s a quick decision matrix:
For mission-critical platforms—Patroni is your enterprise-grade standard.
Real-World Example: Why One Ashnik Customer Switched to Patroni
A global eye care company migrated from native streaming to:
- Patroni + etcd for automated orchestration
- HAProxy for client routing
- PgBackRest for incremental backups
- PgBouncer for connection pooling
Result: Zero unplanned downtime and seamless failover management.
Explore PostgreSQL Platform Services
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Skipping fencing logic in Patroni
- Ignoring DNS TTL and client caching
- Unprotected REST APIs
FAQs
- Can I use repmgr and Patroni together?
No, they’re mutually exclusive. - Is etcd mandatory for Patroni?
No, you can use Consul or ZooKeeper. - Is native streaming enough with scripts?
Only for non-critical environments.
Final Thoughts: Don’t Just Replicate—Orchestrate
High Availability means automated recovery, awareness, and resilience. Native replication alone isn’t enough for modern workloads.
Architecture-first. Outcome-aligned.
Your HA Readiness Checklist
- Cluster state always visible
- Automated failover validated
- Connection pools HA-aware
- Backups failover-aligned
- Robust monitoring integrated
Ready to Rethink Your HA Architecture?
Ashnik helps enterprises deploy cloud-ready PostgreSQL platforms with SLA-driven failover.